Why has telehealth adoption taken so long in the health-care industry when Skype, cell phones, and other video conferencing applications have been used in personal and business interactions for decades?
Why has telehealth adoption taken so long in the health-care industry when Skype, cell phones, and other video conferencing applications have been used in personal and business interactions for decades? Why has telehealth adoption taken so long in the health-care industry when Skype, cell phones, and other video conferencing applications have been used in personal and business interactions for decades?
12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement Initial Post Content/Comprehension 5 points possible
Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail.
4-5 points
Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited.
2-3 points
Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed.
0-1 points
Initial Post Timeliness 2 points possible
Submits initial post by deadline.
2 points
Submits initial post one to three days late.
1 points
Submits initial post after three days.
0 points
Initial Post Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics 2 points possible
Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required.
2 point
Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors.
1 point
Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required.
0 point
Peer Responses Engagement/Classroom Interaction 4.5 points possible (One to two response posts, please refer to the week’s discussion for specific requirements)
Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail.
4-4.5 points
Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail.
2-3 points
Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail.
0-1 points
Peer Responses Timeliness 2 points possible
Submits peer response posts by deadline.
2 point
Submits peer response posts late.
0 points
Peer Responses Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics 2 points possible
Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required.
2 point
Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors.
1 point
Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required.
0 point