The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care’s , paper help ( Chapter 52)

Question descriptionDO NOT BID IF YOU CANNOT DELIVER A+ WORK

For this term paper, review all materials in Chapter 52 along with The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care’s report “http://www.nationalconsensusproject.org/Guidelines_Download2.aspx)” In the report, review the following domains:

• Domain 3-Psychological Aspects of Care

• Domain 4-Social Aspects of Care

• Domain 5-Spiritual Aspects of Care

• Domain 6-Cultural Aspects of Care

• Domain 8-Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care

After completing your reading, along with any other source, if any, of your choosing, address and support your particular position/view on the following issues, and, specifically, how you would apply the Saint Leo University core values of community, respect, and integrity into your actions.

Be sure to review project guidelines and scoring rubric .

GBA 231—Term Paper Requirements and Grading Rubric
Review all materials in Chapter 52 along with The National Consensus Project for Quality
Palliative Care’s report “Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care.” In the report,
review the following domains:
 Domain 3-Psychological Aspects of Care
 Domain 4-Social Aspects of Care
 Domain 5-Spiritual Aspects of Care
 Domain 6-Cultural Aspects of Care
 Domain 8-Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care
After completing your reading, along with any other sources, if any, of your choosing, address
and support your particular position/view on the following specific issues, and, specifically, how
you would apply the Saint Leo University core values of community, respect, and integrity into
your actions. Be sure to use proper APA format for citations.
1. What are the potential foreseeable financial, psychological, and medical, yet unintended,
harmful consequences to one’s family and friends in failing to provide a properly
executed will and living will prior to one’s final illness and death?
2. What are the fundamental distinctions between recuperative medical care and palliative
care? Who should be included in the decision to modify care from recuperative to
palliative? When, if ever, is the right to refuse any and all medical care appropriate
when such virtually ensures the death of the patient?
3. What professionals, medical or otherwise, should be involved in advising decisions
concerning end-of-life wishes? How does euthanasia differ from a simple cessation of
treatment? Who should make end of life decisions for those who are without a family
member to take on such a role?
4. What measures can be taken to ensure the quality of ongoing family and social
relationships, individually and as a group, to end-of-life patients? What pitfalls are to be
avoided in ensuring maintenance of these relationships? What actions may be taken to
ensure the spiritual and existential dimensions of the process are respected and
integrated?
You must submit this assignment as a word document to the appropriate course Dropbox no
later than Sunday 11:59 PM EST/EDT. (This Dropbox basket is linked to Turnitin.)
Grading Rubric
Element
Scoring Ratings
Exceptional
(exceeds
expectations;
performance is
outstanding)
Proficient
(meets expectations;
performance is
satisfactory)
Basic
(works towards
meeting expectations;
performance needs
improvement)
Insufficient
(does not meet
expectations;
performance is
substandard)
Missing
(Criterion is
missing or not
in evidence)
Practical necessity
of the Will and
Living Will
24-25 Points 20-23 Points 18-19 Points 1-17 Points 0 Points
Recuperative/
Palliative Care
The Right to Cease
All Care
24-25 Points 20-23 Points 18-19 Points 1-17 Points 0 Points
Active/Passive
Euthanasia 24-25 Points 20-23 Points 18-19 Points 1-17 Points 0 Points
Addressing
Social/Family
Needs and
Spiritual/
Existential Needs
24-25 Points 20-23 Points 18-19 Points 1-17 Points 0 Points