Personal Time Managment

Instructions

Analyze: Personal Time Managment

Evaluation Title: Time Management Calendar and Essay

Part 1:  Complete the time-management Calendar (Weekly Schedule) you are tasked with mapping out your weekly schedule utilizing the time management calendar and essay document.

Part 2: Write a short essay of 300 words or more, explaining what some of the strengths and weaknesses of your current weekly schedule are in regards to managing the time needed for your coursework. What is one schedule change you could make that could positively impact your educational goals?

Note: Feel free to color-code your assignment (you don’t have to), but please make sure to fill in each box with words as well… not colors alone. All boxes/cells should have at least one word in them.

Please submit both parts of this assignment all as one Excel document, as there is room to the right of the chart to type your essay.

Attention Mac users: Make sure to save and submit this as an Excel document, NOT as a “.numbers” file.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Assignment Files

Time Management Calendar and Essay [Excel Document]

Rubric

PD121 Unit 2 Assessment – Time ManagementPD121 Unit 2 Assessment – Time ManagementCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent60.0 pts5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.54.0 pts4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.48.0 pts3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.42.0 pts2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.36.0 pts1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 pts0There is no evidence of a defined statement.60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis60.0 pts5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.54.0 pts4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.48.0 pts3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.42.0 pts2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.36.0 pts1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.0.0 pts0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting30.0 pts5The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.27.0 pts4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.24.0 pts3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.21.0 pts2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.18.0 pts1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 pts0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.30.0 pts