Nursing Care Interventions
Type: Case Study
Topic : Nursing Care Interventions
Length: 1000 words
Reference: APA
Time frame: 12 – 15 hours
Instructions
For this paper, you are required to write a 1000 words using one nursing care intevention to compare two case studies. This means you will use one nursing care intervention for each of the case studies provided. This is a comparative essay. See comparative essay example in blue font.
NSB021: Assessment 2 Comparative Essay Student name _________________________ Number _______________
| Criteria | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 (←pass) | 3 (fail →) | 2 – 1 |
| Discussed age related developmental modification to care that demonstrated foundational-level clinical decision making skills | · Discussion correctly identified similarities / differences in care
· Discussion points always clearly made links between nursing care modification and age related needs demonstrating clinical decision making |
· Discussion correctly identified similarities / differences in care
· 1 or 2 discussion points incorrect · Discussion points clearly made links between almost all of nursing care modification and age related needs demonstrating clinical decision making |
· Most of discussion correctly identified similarities / differences in care
· Minor areas incorrect · Discussion points made links between most of nursing care modification and age related needs demonstrating some clinical decision making but: · A few errors or areas where links were not explained clearly |
· Over half of discussion correctly identified similarities / differences in care
· Some areas correct / some incorrect · Discussion points made links between some of nursing care modification and age related needs demonstrating some clinical decision making but: · Links between nursing care and age related modifications unclear in some places or not discussed |
· discussion incorrectly identified similarities / differences in care in more than half of points
· links between nursing care and age are not clearly stated in majority of areas · in majority of essay, writing was descriptive and did not compare and contrast nursing care related to age |
· Limited / no attempt at discussion of similarities or differences in care
· Points largely incorrect · Large sections not related to essay topic · Limited / no contrast between nursing care and patient age related needs · Links incorrect or not stated |
| evidence utilisation: located and incorporated a range of relevant information from scholarly sources that supported your discussion | · Discussion pointsalways incorporate a range of current and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support | · Discussion points mostly incorporate a range of current and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support. | · Discussion points incorporate current and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support, more often than not.
· Some points are not adequately supported by valid literature |
· Discussion points incorporate somecurrent and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support
· More than half of points are relevant to topic and based in valid evidence but: · Some points are not adequately supported by valid literature · Some areas lacked valid reference sources / support |
· Discussion points incorporate some current and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support however:
· Major sections use invalid references · large sections of your written assignment are not based on identified valid evidence |
· Discussion points do not incorporate current and relevant nursing literature from scholarly sources as support
· sources of information are incorrectly or not identified · writing is characterized by an absence of scientific evidence |
| Communicate in academic writing | logically and succinctlystructured the content to create a coherent essay by: | logically structured the content to create a coherent essay by: | structured the content to create an essay that had coherent sections by: | partially structured the content into loosely-linked rudimentary paragraphs by: | made some statements that occasionally related to the topic by: | writing did not address the given topic |
| · used formal academic language
· mostly adhered to conventions of academic writing set out in cite|write |
mostly used formal academic language
mostly adhered to conventions of academic writing set out in cite|write |
sometimes used formal academic language
some adherence to conventions of academic writing set out in cite|write |
only used informal language
violated some conventions of academic writing set out in cite/write |
· Language was unclear in many areas
· violated conventions of academic writing set out in QUT cite|write |
||
| consistentlyadhered to the English conventions of grammar, paragraphing, punctuation, spelling | mainly adhered to the English conventions of grammar, paragraphing, punctuation, spelling | mostly followed the English conventions of grammar, paragraphing, punctuation, spelling | mostly followed the English conventions of grammar, paragraphing, punctuation, spelling | occasionally used the English conventions of grammar, punctuation, spelling | English expression was unclear / incorrect in many areas
Many grammar, spelling punctuation errors |
|
| accurately and consistently adhered to QUT APA referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list | almost always accurately and consistently adhered to QUT APA referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list | accurately followed, for the most part, QUT APA referencing conventions in both the text and the reference list | followed some of QUT APA referencing conventions in both the text and the reference list
few minor errors |
occasionally referenced and acknowledged a source of information
several errors in referencing style |
· Errors in within textreferencing
· APA reference list with 5 or more errors |
|
| consistently presented in the required style | · mostly presented in the required style | · presentation showed some aspects of the required style | · presentation showed few aspects of the required style | · ignored the required style in most of the assessment | · ignored the required style | |
| Comments
Strengths / what was done well in this assessment |
||||||
| Limitations in this assessment / what to improve in future | ||||||
| Suggestions for how to improve this type of assessment in the future |
Grade ____________ Marker Signature __________________