Reply to at least two of your peers. From what each of your peers learned from their clinician expert, what are some helpful tips you might apply to your own clinical research area of interest? What other thoughts do you have to support your peers to continue to explore their clinical research area of interest? Response 300 word per post, 3 sources within 3 years. Be specific.
Search the GCU Library and find two new health care articles that use quantitative research. Do not use articles from a previous assignment, or articles that appear in the Topic Materials or textbook.
Complete an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis: Part 2” template.
Refer to the “Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Hospital-at-Home and Usual Hospital Care for COPD Exacerbations: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial,” in conjunction with the “Article Analysis Example 2,” for an example of an article analysis.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Â
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the for assistance.
Republicans have been undermining the ACA and oppose various Medicare-for-all proposals. In addition to party politics and differences, sections of the healthcare industry oppose certain changes in the Medicare-for-all options.
Using 500-750 words, write an initial post that describes the political alliances and positions by party and in the industry. In your analysis, include the financial arguments and the political/ideological arguments about the role of government versus the private sector changes that are intended to increase coverage. You must reference the KFF comparison of proposals (.
Please refer to the for details on how this activity will be graded.
Response 300 word to each post. the review can be in agreement or disagreement, and explain, support with sources
Response to Discussion board
For this response, compare and contrast your vulnerable population to theirs. What do you see as their population’s most resilient characteristics? Replies must utilize at least two scholarly references per peer post.
My Post is Mentally Ill and my peers post is Migrant Workers
Response to Discussion board
For this response, compare and contrast your vulnerable population to theirs. What do you see as their population’s most resilient characteristics? Replies must utilize at least two scholarly references per peer post.
My Post is Mentally Ill and my peers post is Combat veterans.
Reply to your classmate. In your reply posts, include how the information you learned from your peer’s initial post will help you to provide care to a patient.
My peers post is attached with heading Full Thickness Burn
reply to your classmate. In your reply posts, include how the information you learned from your peer’s initial post will help you to provide care to a patient.
Please see peers post in attached file
There are a number of mental health providers (Nurse Practitioners included) that are not as familiar with the latest developments in neuroscience and are a bit skeptical about its use in their clinical practice. introduce the concept of neuroscience and explain how some of the latest developments can be used in everyday practice. Discusses the problem of stigma and the role of clinicians in dispelling myths about mental illness.
1- Has your understanding of brain science changed? In what way?
2. Please comment and give an example of how you anticipate or have already incorporated your understanding of neuroscience into the counseling and treatment of your clients.
3. In what ways have you noticed or personally experienced the marginalization of persons with mental illness, their relationship with health care providers or their ability to access care?
Introduction
You should have met with an expert clinician who works and/or studies in your chosen research area of interest (for example, masters or doctoral-prepared nurse, MD, PsyD, PhD, PA). This person might be a colleague or peer where you are currently employed, a local hospital or other organization, an author of a research paper you read, or someone you found during an Internet search. You could have met with this person in person, using Zoom, or over the phone, but your conversation must be a verbal discussion that lasts approximately 20 to 30 minutes.
During the interview, you should have asked the expert: what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist; their recommendations they have you to conduct research to figure out how to fill these gaps; what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist. Other questions asked should have included:
You should have met with an expert clinician who works and/or studies in your chosen research area of interest (for example, masters or doctoral-prepared nurse, MD, PsyD, PhD, PA). This person might be a colleague or peer where you are currently employed, a local hospital or other organization, an author of a research paper you read, or someone you found during an Internet search. You could have met with this person in person, using Zoom, or over the phone, but your conversation must be a verbal discussion that lasts approximately 20 to 30 minutes.
During the interview, you should have asked the expert: what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist; their recommendations they have for you to conduct research to figure out how to fill these gaps; what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist. Other questions asked should have included:
After completing your interview, please respond to the following:
Sources within 3 years from american journals
You should have met with an expert clinician who works and/or studies in your chosen research area of interest (for example, masters or doctoral-prepared nurse, MD, PsyD, PhD, PA)
– During the interview, you should have asked the expert: what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist regarding ” Fall in elders living alone”
– their recommendations they have for you to conduct research to figure out how to fill these gaps;
– what gaps in knowledge in the science they believe exist. Other questions asked should have included:
After completing your interview, please respond to the following: