Use the A-B-C-D method of writing objectives. The objectives should incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy, be written at the appropriate level for the audience, and include at least two learning domains (cognitive, psychomotor, and affective)

Nur 649E
Paper details

Using the Personal Class Design Project – Part 1 assignment you began in NUR-647E, you will complete the course design to include learner objectives, outline, teaching strategies, and associated evaluation, and method.

Using Part I, write and revise the original learner objectives submitted.

Use the A-B-C-D method of writing objectives. The objectives should incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy, be written at the appropriate level for the audience, and include at least two learning domains (cognitive, psychomotor, and affective). Refer to ”NUR-649E – Nursing Education Seminar II: A-B-C-D Approach to Objective Writing” and ”NUR-649E – Nursing Education Seminar II: Learning Domains.”

Map out a class time frame, outlining when to cover each of the content areas. Refer to ”NUR-649E – Nursing Education Seminar II: Lesson Plan Template.”

In addition to the content area, include the class time frame:

  1. Time frame for covering each topic area
  2. Teaching strategy for each objective
  3. How the learning will be evaluated

Include rationale for each selected instruction and the evaluation method used.

Support your rationale by citing at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed resources (less than 5 years old) in addition to the course materials.

There is no predetermined length for this assignment. It is intended that each student will develop a class that can be utilized in the student’s selected area of education.

Personal Class Design Project: Part 2 Rubic

1No Submissions0.00%

2Unsatisfactory75.00%

3Less than Satisfactory80.00%

4Satisfactory88.00%

5Good92.00%

6Excellent100.00%

70.0 %Content

10.0 %Writes or Revises Learner Objectives Using the A-B-C-D Method of Writing Objectives. Incorporate Bloom’s Taxonomy; Objectives Written at the Appropriate Level of Audience.

None

Objectives not written using the A-B-C-D method.

Learner objectives revised using the A-B-C-D method, but objectives do not incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy, or may not be written at the appropriate level of audience.

Learner objectives revised using the A-B-C-D method. Objectives incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy and are written at the appropriate level of audience.

Learner objectives revised using the A-B-C-D method. Objectives incorporate a balance of higher and lower Bloom?s taxonomy and are written at the appropriate level of audience.

Learner objectives revised using the A-B-C-D method. Objectives make full uses of the higher levels of Bloom’s taxonomy for critical thinking when appropriate and are written at the appropriate level of audience.

10.0 %Objectives include at least two learning domains: cognitive, and psychomotor and affective. Indicates which objectives are linked to which domains.

None

Objectives do not include at least two learning domains: cognitive, and psychomotor and affective.

Objectives include two learning domains: cognitive, and psychomotor and affective, but fails to indicate which objectives are linked.

Objectives include two learning domains (cognitive, and psychomotor and affective) and indicate which objectives are linked.

Objectives include more than two learning domains (cognitive, and psychomotor and affective) and indicate which objectives are linked.

Objectives include all the learning domains (cognitive, and psychomotor and affective) and indicate which objectives are linked.

50.0 %Class Time Frame Covers: Topic and Content Area. (10%) Teaching Strategies for Each Topic. (10%) Evaluation Strategy for Entire Program. (10%) Rationale for Each Selected Teaching and Evaluation Strategy. (20%)

None

Class time frames do not cover all four criteria (topic area, teaching strategies, evaluation, and rationale).

Class time frames cover all four criteria, but four criteria are incomplete or inappropriate for stated objectives.

Class time frames cover all four criteria and the four criteria are stated though they could use further development.

Class time frames cover all four criteria and individual criteria are complete.

Class time frames cover all four criteria and they are both detailed and comprehensive.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Organization

None

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationship to each other.

Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are used appropriately.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Individually and collectively, paragraphs are coherent and cohesive.

5.0 %Length

None

*Unacceptable length to class design ? it is too short to address the assignment criteria at the expected scope

None

Acceptable length to class design. Plan is appropriate in length ? some sections may be too short while others are a bit too long.

None

*Excellent length to class design. Clearly and concisely addresses assignment criteria. Flows nicely ? not too short and does not ramble.

5.0 %Language

None

Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence structure, lack of variety in language use. Unaware of audience.

Some distracting and/or inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and or word choice are present.

Sentence structure is correct and occasionally varies. Word choices and language are appropriate to the targeted audience.

Clearly aware of audience; uses a variety of sentence structures and appropriate vocabulary; uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

Uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choices in unique and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope

3.0 %Scholarly References (Utilizes at Least Three Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed Resources Less Than Five Years Old in Addition to Course Materials)

None

*Selected literature is irrelevant and insufficient. Does not meet stated criteria. Does not use evidence-based sources when available. Uses only course materials.

*Weak selection of sufficient and relevant literature (less than five years old) and no scholarly, peer-reviewed references used (other than course materials). Uses only course materials.

*Fair selection of sufficient and relevant literature (less than five years old) and at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed reference used (other than course materials). Does not use evidence-based sources when available.

*Partial selection of sufficient and relevant literature (less than five years old) and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed references used (other than course materials). Uses evidence-based sources when available.

*Excellent selection of sufficient and relevant literature (less than five years old) and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed references used (other than course materials). Uses evidence-based sources when available.

2.0 %Proofreading

None

Paper does not appear spell-checked and proofread at the graduate level.

None

None

None

Paper appears spell-checked and proofread at the graduate level.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Mechanics

None

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Mechanical and sentence structure errors are frequent and repetitive; distracting to reader.

Some mechanical and sentence structure errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.

Document is largely free of sentence structure and mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written American English. No errors are present.

5.0 %APA Format

None

Correct APA format is not evident in the paper.

Correct APA format is infrequently used in the paper: Cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA.

Correct APA format is inconsistently used in the paper: Cover page, margins, double-spacing, and all other elements of APA.

Correct APA format is mostly used in the paper: Cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA. Correct APA format is mostly used in the paper: Cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA.

Correct APA format is consistently used in the paper: Cover page, margins, double-spacing, font size, and all other elements of APA such as headings and pagination.

100 %Total Weightage

see attached part 1