How to Write an Article Review

 

Article review formats allow scholars and students to critically evaluate the work of others in a field. Experts often look at the work of peers outside of education to assess its originality, clarity, and contribution. All those who will be writing an article review need to know the definition. An article review is necessary to have a clear understanding of its contents and be able to use it in the future. There are many scientific articles published today, both electronic and printed. You need to know how to identify and analyze scientifically relevant studies from the vast array of information available.

An Article Review is Essential

Analytical evaluations of articles written by other authors are done to assess the suitability of the hypotheses and theories as well as the calculations that were made for the reviewer. Science is the process of finding and applying information to create new knowledge. Scientists can exchange their results through specialized journals, which are an invaluable source of information.

Analyzing a review is a process. Analysing is the study of the structure of a phenomenon or process. A scientific publication should be structured logically. It lends itself to analysis and evaluation.

The focus of a scientific article can influence the method used to analyze it. A study published in a mathematics and physics edition will be treated differently than a paper published in a journal that is more humanitarian. However, there are some general principles to be adhered to.

How to write an article review

when writing an Article review, it is important to consider these  key elements.

  1. Publication’s formal characteristics. The credibility of a journal is a key factor in the scientific community. There are many factors that influence credibility: the journal’s historical popularity (names that are considered to be authoritative), strong citations that indicate that it is publishing research that is of high quality, strict peer review (ensures the selection of quality articles), and thematic focus (the more narrow it is the better it will find useful content for the reader).
  2. Author. Trust and enthusiasm are more likely to be shown by a well-respected scientist in their field. It is also important to consider the affiliation of the author with a university or scientific institution. The article that was published within the context of a grant has an added value because the author has met the criteria for justification and competition selection.
  3. Annotation. Annotation. An annotation allows the reader to predict whether or not the text will be interesting and useful.
  4. Relevance of the topic. These points are required by most scientific journals to be highlighted in the body. The reader should understand the problem it solves before they read an article. These solutions are unique in their scientific novelty, innovative approach and unique perspective on the problem in question.
  5. Stylistic matching. The reader must ensure that the author is an expert in their field from the very first lines. You must adhere to strict criteria regarding style, terminology clarity, and text integrity. A person who has the right skills and knowledge can create a valuable scientific article.
  6. Sequence of presentation. The structure and logic of a scientific text must be clear. It is essential that the hypothesis must be thoroughly considered, using only defined methods and sources. At the end, you will draw well-founded conclusions.
  7. High quality of used literature. Before you read the main article, make sure you open the list of previously used literature. These must be relevant and authoritative texts. A detailed analysis of any previous research that the author has used is also a key point in the article.
  8. Detail methodology. This is essential to ensure that the material is solid and retains its value. Scientists can only build theories and draw conclusions if they have a clearly defined method.
  9. Experimental component. Data from experiments, sociological surveys, scientometric research, are presented in a correct manner and within the context of accepted terminology. They should be understandable by specialists in the field. The reviewer will evaluate the method used by the researcher to record events and assess how they interacted with other phenomena. What approach was used? Was it subjective, creative, or dogmatic.
  10. Critical analysis. Two main elements of the methodology are used to assess the work’s value. Theoretical: What new knowledge is the publication providing? This theory is needed by whom? Practical: Is it tested? What and where can you use the results? What are they changing? Is the author impartial? Is the author able to back up his or her conclusions and does it match the research results?
  11. The validity and value of the findings. The last part of the text takes into consideration the research conducted. These conclusions are consistent with the previously mentioned novelty, relevance, target orientation.

 

 Criteria for evaluation for writing a journal review

You should be aware of these things when choosing and analyzing a scientific article to write a review.

  1. The presentation of material in scientific style
  2. Scientists who supervise the author
  3. Theses, information, main points, and the content of the material
  4. The theoretical significance of the methods proposed
  5. Practical relevance
  6. The text amount
  7. Analytical materials

 

Formats: MLA Article Review and APA Article Review

When it comes to article reviews, citing styles such as MLA or APA can cause a lot of headaches. It is important to correctly communicate your thoughts, analyse them, and then bring them together in a cohesive form. You must also ensure that your citations are correct. This detail may not seem important at first, but it can lead to a poor grade in your article review.

The good news? Both an MLA format and APA format article review are very different. This means you don’t have to learn a completely new way to highlight your sources. Understanding the differences will help you make article reviews easier. These similar features can cause confusion and may pose a problem for some people.

Formatting is the same for both APA and MLA style articles. This information must include author’s names, source names, publisher and publication years. The order in which these information is presented is slightly different.

You should pay more attention when using APA format to cite. It is different from MLA format. A publication address is also required. APA citations should be formatted in the following manner: author’s last name, initials. (Year of publication). Italics of the title of the source. (Number and type of edition). Publication Place: Publisher.