Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/facilees/public_html/wp-content/themes/enfold/framework/php/function-set-avia-frontend.php on line 637
Critically analyse the concepts of limited liability and separate corporate personality within the context of the relevant case law.
The assignment question focuses on the concept of corporate veil / separate legal entity, and whether ‘justice’ should be used to pierce the corporate veil.
Discuss the relevant case laws and statute where appropriate.
’I’ Introduction – which is where you will briefly outline your research question and state how you plan to go about exploring it;
‘I’ – IDENTIFY the issue;
‘R’ – Explain the RULES’ surrounding the relevant area / issue;
‘A’ – APPLY the relevant legal principles, both those stemming from statutory law as well as those stemming from relevant case law to the factual situation(s) and/or issue(s) at hand;
‘A’ – ARGUMENT this is where you will see what kind of result you have end up with, after your application of law to the fact(s) and/or issue(s) and you will therefore built main argument;
and finally, ‘C’ – CONCLUSION which is where you will sum up your work.
Referenced using Harvard and that it includes a Harvard reference list at the end.
Do not use abbreviations such as ‘eg’, ‘ie’’. Please use proper paragraphing / paraphrasing.
Additional information:
Starting with Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd case and
before and after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 at 508.
Sources: McLaughlin, Susan. Unlocking Company
Case Law
Other Books
Discuss the relevant case laws and statute where appropriate.
’I’ Introduction – which is where you will briefly outline your research question and state how you plan to go about exploring it;
‘I’ – IDENTIFY the issue;
‘R’ – Explain the RULES’ surrounding the relevant area / issue;
‘A’ – APPLY the relevant legal principles, both those stemming from statutory law as well as those stemming from relevant case law to the factual situation(s) and/or issue(s) at hand;
‘A’ – ARGUMENT this is where you will see what kind of result you have end up with, after your application of law to the fact(s) and/or issue(s) and you will therefore built main argument;
and finally, ‘C’ – CONCLUSION which is where you will sum up your work.
Referenced using Harvard and that it includes a Harvard reference list at the end.
Do not use abbreviations such as ‘eg’, ‘ie’’. Please use proper paragraphing / paraphrasing.
Additional information:
Starting with Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd case and
before and after Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415 at 508.
Sources: McLaughlin, Susan. Unlocking Company
Case Law
Other Books
